You are here . on the pale blue dot


'Anonymous' comments without a pseudonym are not published.

Comments for publication should be 'on topic' and not involve third parties please.
If pseudonyms are linked to commercial sites the comments will be removed as spam.

Tuesday, 3 February 2015

Do we want a Church of England as intolerant as the Church in Wales and ECUSA?


"Children at the church's Sunday school have written letters to the bishop about the protest"


It used to be "Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man". Now it is more likely to be 'Give me the child... and I'll show you the woman' as witnessed by the work of St Oswalds' Sunday School children in Knuzden, Lancs.

Their work illustrates that the children in St Oswald's have been tuned to the same wavelength as their vicar's by enthusiastically endorsing her decision to maintain a ten minute silence instead of preaching a sermon in protest against the consecration of the Rev Philip North as the Bishop of Burnley. As the Archbishop of Canterbury has indicated there are many clergy today who could follow the vicar's example, allowing their congregations time for silent reflection but not for the reason stated.

The Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, made his position abundantly clear in his outright rejection of accusations that he was giving credence to a theology of taint but that was not good enough for those who presume to know better. From the Telegraph: The Campaign group WATCH (Women And The Church) said: "We are dismayed that it seems that the Archbishop of York will not lay hands on Philip North at his consecration as Bishop of Burnley. We believe it is unprecedented that an archbishop should be present at a consecration in his own province and not lay hands on a candidate, and not preside at the Eucharist. We are saddened that there will be such a powerful visual sign of a divided College and House of Bishops at the moment of consecration."

They would say that, wouldn't they? If the example of Our Lord Jesus Christ is not good enough for them, who the hell is the Most Reverend and Right Honourable Dr John Sentamu?

Following the Libby Lane circus, the 'new bishop' frenzy has subsided to the point that the consecration of Fr Philip North has warranted only the briefest of mentions, mainly to emphasis divisions invented by the women's lobby in their continuing divisive campaign despite the strenuous efforts of Archbishops of Canterbury and York to put the troubles facing the Church of England behind them. But these farcical feminists frivolities continue. The Feast of the Presentation of Christ in the Temple (Candlemas) was celebrated in St Mary’s Church, Thatcham, last night with a special service to a mark the consecration of the first female bishop in the Church of England as if to emphasis what has become the main priority in the Church of England today.

These sideshows detract from the essential teaching of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. The Catholic faith has been redefined in the Church of England to suit the wants of a few. As one of the art works in the above illustration puts it: "One Church not two!" Unfortunately the irony of that will be lost in St Oswald's under the guidance of their protesting vicar.

The show is over for now, to be resumed when the next woman bishop is consecrated and possibly the one after that. Then what, when the occasion becomes old hat?  United we stand, divided we fall!

6 comments:

  1. Llandaff Pelican3 February 2015 at 14:06

    Not only has the priest-in-charge of St Oswald's Knuzden done a massive umdrehen ("I wasn't really protesting, honestly; I was only giving people space for silence) as she saw a complaint under the Clergy Discipline Measure looming on the horizon for failing to preach at the principle service on Sunday (Canon B2.4); but from the panic-stricken 'sweeping-up-the mess-I have-made-for-myself' interview she did on the local Beeb, I would say she is not to be numbered among the 'learned clergy'! In that respect, she would fit in well with most of Byzantine Barry's babes and the likes of Peggy the Pilate. What's the betting the Byzantine one has already been on the 'phone to offer her a job, as he gets bored of the former Golf Caddy and the Ass, and is planning their succession?

    The real blessing of Philip North's consecration (apart from the obvious fact that a gifted priest has become a bishop) is that an Anglican Primate, who is a solid supporter of women's ordination, who is consistent in his concern for justice for ALL minorities, has shown something of the breadth of Anglican generosity in recognising the need to accommodate a theological conviction he does not share. In other words, he practices what he preaches. Actions, he recognises, speak louder than words. He knows it's no good standing in a pulpit, flatly delivering the same old, worn-out, tedious platitudes of the 1970s about acceptance, compassion and 'the God of Jesus this and the God of Jesus that' if you turn around to those who are different and, effectively, tell them to 'F*** Off'! How far, geographically, philosophically, and humanely, York Minster is from Llandaff Cathedral.

    ReplyDelete
  2. One bishop so far - another two or three and perhaps even Ruth Gledhill will get over it? Perhaps not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Re: ‘her decision to maintain a ten minute silence instead of preaching a sermon…’ dare one venture that it was probably the most profound sermon that she has ever preached? I wish a few other clerics would follow her example and keep their mouths closed on a Sunday morning!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd do what all decent folk do during a boring (non)sermon and peruse those delightful Articles in the back of the book.

    I suppose the biggest hoo-har will be when a diocese is under enemy control so poor priests have non licences.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Vicar of St.Oswalds, in failing to educate the Sunday School children ,is creating within her church a self fulfilling prophecy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course, this part of the great 'Hoo-Har' among the liberalati of the C of E who did not realise that they actually voted through the arrangements to allow a traditionalist bishop to be consecrated by those who share his theological convictions. Having lost the vote first time round because of their mean-spirited attempts to exclude all who disagreed with them, they were then so desperate to have women bishops at any cost they didn't bother to read the small print. By their fruits shall you know them...

    ReplyDelete