You are here . on the pale blue dot

Blog notes

Anonymous comments for publication must include a pseudonym.

They should be 'on topic' and not involve third parties.
If pseudonyms are linked to commercial sites comments will be removed as spam.
The blog owner is unable to ‘unfollow’ Followers.

Thursday, 8 January 2015

And it came to pass in these days....

...."From 5% on, they [Muslims] exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. For example, they will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature halal on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. This is occurring in:

France -- 8%
Philippines -- 5%
Sweden -- 5%
Switzerland -- 4.3%
The Netherlands -- 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves (within their ghettos) under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islamists is to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. In Paris, we are already seeing car-burnings. Any non Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats, such as in Amsterdam, with opposition to Mohammed cartoons and films about Islam..."

"...It is important to understand that in some countries, with well under 100% Muslim populations, such as France, the minority Muslim populations live in ghettos, within which they are 100% Muslim, and within which they live by Sharia Law. The national police do not even enter these ghettos. There are no national courts, nor schools, nor non-Muslim religious facilities. In such situations, Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. The children attend madrasses. They learn only the Koran. To even associate with an infidel is a crime punishable with death. Therefore, in some areas of certain nations, Muslim Imams and extremists exercise more power than the national average would indicate.

Today's 1.5 billion Muslims make up 22% of the world's population. But their birth rates dwarf the birth rates of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, and all other believers. Muslims will exceed 50% of the world's population by the end of this century..."

From “Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat” here.


  1. There are already no-go areas in many UK cities - controlled by violent islamists determined to extend their sway over the whole population. If our government does not act decisively and strongly to rein in islam in the UK, it will take control of our society by 2050.

  2. One day later and still no expression of sympathy or a statement of support from Archbishop Barry Morgan, or any other CinW bishop, for the victims of the Charlie Hebdo massacre. The Archbishop of Canterbury has issued a statement
    Likewise, Cardinal Vincent Nichols has published a message of solidarity and prayerful support. And from the leader of the Anglican Church in Wales … NOTHING! Perhaps he doesn’t believe in the values of a free, liberal, tolerant society, a free press, and the freedom of speech? Shame on you Dr Morgan!

    1. But just one day later and the "Muslim Orchestra" is out in force! The BBC and liberal politicians (of all political colours) are rushing to trumpet the benefits of 'our diverse communities', and reminding the masses that Muslims are just peace loving brown people who like spicy food!
      I would have thought that this attack would show the atheist liberal left that Islam is more anti-free speech, anti-gay and anti-women's rights than Christianity, and they may end their un-holy alliance. This lasted one day before they embraced again in their mutual love-in that must surely end badly, eventually.

    2. It is one of the ironies of church life in Wales under the current senior management team that if there had been a Jihadist attack against the offices of the LGBT organisation Stonewall, His Darkness would have been all over the media like a rash. But because Charlie Hebdo is a satirical publication – a brand of free speech absolutely despised, hated and rejected by His Darkness the Grand Mufti of Wales (presumably because his own crass leadership and inept ministry has been the target of so much wonderfully original and edgy satirical comment) – this is why he has failed to issue any statement of sympathy or support for Charlie Hebdo. Je suis Charlie!

  3. Beleaguered of Bangor9 January 2015 at 09:00

    Up here, of course, we have clear memories of Barry Morgan pulping the C in W's Welsh language journal, Y Llan, when a cartoon of Mohammed, God and Abraham accompanied an article calling for greater understanding between the Jewish, Christian and Islamic faiths. There is BBC footage of him going in to churches to collect copies to be destroyed. Barry and (here's a surprise) Carl Cooper lied to the media about our former Archdeacon resigning his editorship, when he had, in fact resigned three months earlier. Barry went prostrate to the Muslim Council of Wales to beg forgiveness. Barry launched one of his bad-tempered invectives against our former Archdeacon, and then didn't like it when the Archdeacon put the record straight in the Church times by unmasking the lies and insisting on free speech. Thankfully, our Bishop at the time was Tony Crockett (not the puppet Andy Pandy) who publicly backed the Archdeacon and told Barry to lay off. So, if you're wondering why Barry has not flown into print to defend free speech, you know why. The journalist Sion Jobbins published an account of the whole unsavoury episode in a recent book. The title of the article is "Llanistan"!

    1. More on this later - Watch this space!


  4. Fascinated Outsider9 January 2015 at 10:14

    Ah yes. I'd forgotten about this. And if I remember correctly it was Canon Aled Edwards OBE who insisted on the pulping because his work at the Sennedd and Cytun put him in a "unique position" to know what was politically correct. I'm sure this was completely unrelated to the fact that the former Archdeacon succeeded him as vicar of Eglwys Dewi Sant in Cardiff and brought the catholic faith to life there after Edwards' pathetic so-called evangelical 'relevance.' Interestingly, the former Archdeacon of Bangor is now an Archdeacon in the Diocese in Europe. Their Bishop has just issued a statement saying "We pray especially for journalists, artists and novelists at this heart-breaking and fearful time. We give thanks for their courage; and we pray that they may have the freedom to tell the truth about the human condition..." Somewhat different from the Archbishop of Wales' pathetic collusions back in 2006. The Archdeacon must be feeling mightily relieved to be working in a diocese with a bishop like this.

  5. Would that be the same publicity-seeking Canon Aled Edwards (see who received his OBE in December 2006 at the same ceremony as the President of the Muslim Council of Wales? He was rewarded quickly for his compliance wasn't he? Strangely, his twitter feed has a retweet of the Pope Francis's condemnation of the Paris butchery - but nothing from the otherwise garrulous Edwards. Surprising. He usually opines about everything else.

  6. It would be very interesting to know what response the media are getting when enquiries to Ms Morrell are seeking the Archbishop's views, wouldn't it? Or, may be they're not asking because Barry Morgan's views simply don't matter any more. Either way, it would be good to see those 2006 newsclips again of the Archbishop rushing around, picking up the copies of Y Llan before sending them to be pulped, and his fear-frozen face as he apologises once more to the Muslim community.