Trainee priest Calvin Robinson Source: Mail Online |
They had been discussing the Church’s race policy, which Calvin had been vocally objecting to for some time. The bishop could not understand that as a black man, he simply did not share her – and the Church hierarchy’s – view on this contentious issue.
He says, "The Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, has proclaimed that the Church of England is ‘deeply institutionally racist’ and called for ‘radical and decisive’ action. Last year an Anti-Racism Task Force recommended using quotas to boost the number of black and ethnic-minority senior clergy, introducing salaried ‘racial justice officers’ in all 42 dioceses and launching ‘racial justice Sunday’ once a year."
Calvin said that he fundamentally disagreed with this approach, which is based on a faith in divisive Left-wing Critical Race Theory, instead of the teachings of Christ. I believe it is divisive and offensive.
The Bishop of Fulham, the Rt Rev Jonathan Baker, told Calvin that there had been ‘a lot of turbulence’ over some of the views he had expressed online and on TV. It was no secret that senior figures in the Church disliked him.
Calvin said, "I am after all a traditionalist – which means I do not believe in the ordination of women – and I have never been afraid to voice my criticism of the Church’s drift away from what I, and many of its parishioners, think are its core values. I did not expect everyone to agree with me, but what I did expect is the right to express my own opinions. I had always been taught that the Church of England was a broad church."
Emails obtained via data-protection rules revealed that bishops at the very top of the Church of England had been closely scrutinising Calvin's public comments: ‘His political agenda is I guess what you would call libertarian – anti-woke, anti-identity politics, Covid-sceptical,’ the Bishop of Fulham wrote in one email. ‘His tweets get him into trouble sometimes and there have been complaints to the Bishop of London that he shouldn’t be ordained.’
Calvin was to be ordained as a deacon with a part-time role as assistant curate at St Alban’s Church in Holborn, central London. In February the Bishop of Fulham, the Rt Rev Jonathan Baker, told him the role was ‘likely to prove problematic, and would not lead to a fruitful or happy formation for you in your early years in ordained ministry’. He offered to reduce his media work but was told he would still not be able to take up the proposed role because ‘that moment had passed’.
At a meeting with Calvin, Bishop Mullally insisted the decision was not about his politics, but because his ‘presence’ on social media and TV ‘is often divisive and brings disunity’.
The Rev Kate Bottley Source OK |
Kate is described on Wikipedia as "a Church of England priest in North Nottinghamshire, a role which she combines with her other roles of journalist, media presenter and reality television star. She appears frequently on British radio and television as well as in newspapers."
As Calvin pointed out, it’s not just issues of race and gender.
It seems the Church will affirm any liberal progressive secular view, but clamp down on conservative views, either political or theological.
"If you defend family values, the sanctity of marriage, all human life being sacred, or the fact that God made us male and female, you will face opprobrium" he said.
"Something has gone wrong. The established Church is entering apostasy, and the faithful masses in the congregations and the hard-working clergy deserve better."
Exactly!
Postscript [01.06.2022]
From Twitter: Cancelled by Woke Church of England - Calvin Robinson
The penalty for keeping the faith. Welcome to the club!
The lunatics are running the asylum. Abandon all hope ye who enter into the Church of England.
ReplyDeleteAnglicanism simply isn't what it was when I began to explore it as 'a neophyte enquirer' sixty years ago; or indeed what it still was for maybe a decade and a half afterwards. My perception, for what it's worth, is that change first began to take - initially rather tenuous - root in the mid-1970s.
ReplyDeleteBy the early '90s the change was wholly accomplished, and it became obvious, to me at any rate, that Anglicanism no longer wanted me, and similarly I no longer felt any continuing allegiance to it. Its answers to the questions which I'd posed when I first started exploring faith in 1960 had changed radically from those which it had given to me back then.
So, it seemed to me, it was time for the parting of the ways. Continuing as an Anglican would henceforth involve protracted partisan hostility and recrimination, and, as I understood it, that didn't appear to be 'how we learned Christ'. So I departed, hopefully in charity.
I sympathize with Calvin and, to judge from what's been presented here, I considerably agree with much of his conscientious ideological position. But that position's no longer one which official Anglicanism shares, and carrying on as an Anglican is unlikely to enable either him or his detractors 'to maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace' or to 'fill him - or them - with all joy and peace in believing'. Best, perhaps, to move on and explore the possibility of finding a spiritual home elsewhere.
In the full article Calvin writes: After becoming increasingly disillusioned, I recently decided to leave the Church of England and join a more orthodox institution, the Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON). Walking away from the Church of England has been heartbreaking.
DeleteBefore too long, one suspects Calvin will find that walking away proves to be a huge relief. The Cult of England is right behind the Cult in Wales and the sooner they both implode, the better.
DeleteWhile I wouldn't say that my own departure from Anglicanism was exactly 'heart-breaking', it was certainly unambiguously sad, because it felt somewhat like betrayal by a friend whom I'd ventured to trust.
DeleteBut facts are facts and what happens is what happens; that's just life. And maybe Calvin will find in his new communion a fellowship which more wholly accords with his convictions and his conscience. If so, he'll have his reward.
That anglican Churches have become the house built on sand. Sound Theology has been abandoned for sound bites, political correctness and virtue signalling.
DeleteI don't know the professions - current or retired - of other AB correspondents, but in mine and over umpteen decades, I have had to both 'fire' staff and reject/decline their line-management promotions. In one case, I rejected the 'job application' of a candidate who hit 100/100 on all boxes simply because his background vetting signalled some social contacts and friendships he had which were unsavoury indeed. Some other reason for his rejection had to be given.
ReplyDeleteGiven the PC intricacies, sensitivities, ever changing employment laws, civil/equality right and the costly litigations which often follow, it made it almost impossible for me to be always truthful in regards to my decisions ... and reasons for them. "Ways and means .." thus came into play.
I don't know ordinand Calvin Robinson nor his Bishop, but I can imagine a situation as so often played out, that a person isn't put forward (for employment or promotion) for underlying reasons which are best kept quiet if some other 'plausible' reason can be offered up. The 'race card' is an awkward one but maybe better option than the bishop's concerns that Robinson was simply too 'media-gobby', ie even before being priested he'd set himself up as a media-rent-a-quote espousing his opinions for personal gain (maybe?). One couldn't decline a candidate on those ground otherwise he could sue under his rights to 'free speech'. So let's find another.
That the story caught the attention of the Daily Mail ought not excite us either. It just so happens that Press generally take pops at anything 'churchy' as it used to with 'dirty vicars' until 'dirty vicar' stories became so common-place they were no longer news.
Lastly, it may be that using some common-sense, the C-of-E has decided that there have already been too many 'controversial' clerics - some of them senior like the former Bishop of Durham - who turn to the Press as their pulpit and perhaps see 'journalism' as their true profession and priesthood as a vocation to feed that ego. In which case, Mr. Robinson was nipped-in-the-bud. I might be wrong. Who'll know.
Old Bill.
I too have no knowledge of Calvin except through his writings and what is written about him. Indeed I came across an article he had written about racism in the CofE which was interesting to read - he made (to my mind) some good points and some with which I disagreed. However I have wondered if the "real" problem is as outlined by Old Bill above - not so much the content of what he's saying but the fact that he appears, as someone who isn't yet even priested, to be very (?too) willing to make his views known.
DeleteThe telegraph also had an excellent article on this too.
ReplyDeleteThe issue seems to be that many many clergy are very vocal left wing activists, and encouraged to be so, as is the entire bench of bishops in the CiW. I know a number of clergy that have stood as labour county councillors with their dioceses blessing (despite they are already in full time employment and can't therefore give the 2/3 days a week required.
Clergy are not however, allowed to express traditional or right wing views. As illustrated here. Conservative Bishops are not appointed, unless like Justin Welby they renounce their politics and become left wing.
During my younger years, Bob Morgan in Ely was the obvious local example.
DeleteIs it the case that he has completed his training but just can't find a job? That happens every now and again - an individual completes their training in the Church of England but for one reason or another is not successful in getting a job. I have watched him on TV and I do think he'd be marmite in a parish. Nothing wrong with that perhaps - just trying to explain what may be happening here.
ReplyDeleteVoiceOfReason
No it is not; his Title Parish was agreed, S.Alban's Holborn; this was agreed till the thought police and attack dogs started
DeleteI too share with Old Bill, Baptist Trainfan and others in suggesting, AB, this is a non-story. And no, I hadn't heard of this particular 'trainee novice' either until I looked him up on various websites. He appears to promote nothing about his Christian 'faith' but profits from the commissions he receives from writing newspaper/website articles and thus - if I were his Bishop - I too might sniff a potential future problem and thus with-hold licensing him as Deacon. Worse, to income-yield from his media-platform, he's arrogantly taken on his more senior Bishop (London) and suffrogen bishop head-on which demonstrates a rather immature if not discourteous and disrespectful start to his aspiration for priesthood. In this he has shown little understanding of the 'politics' of life he espouses in his (fees-earning) writing and self-publicity. 'Non-Woke' from a person of colour is of course a good one to grab the headlines. His vocation is journalism not priesthood. For once, I'm with the Bishops. Give him time to grow up, mull things over, and re-apply in perhaps 10 years time when he understands how and why things work. Self-publicity especially from behind the veil or guise of something else is a dangerous thing. So far as my limited history learning is concerned, only Martin Luther was able to strike a right balance between using the then media for his campaigns and achieving his Christian goals.
ReplyDeleteAd Clerum
DeleteThe Church in Wales loves publicity, as long as it's on theme and supportive of their twisted agenda.
That's why they have Provincial mouthpiece Anna Morrell and Diocesan communications officers too. The bit they don't like at all is when the likes of the Capon and Vicki Burrows throw their toys out of the pram and go public with some of the dirt 💩 💩 💩 and dodgy dealings.
The Old Trout should have stuck to bedpans.
DeleteWhy shouldn't an NSM trainee earn a living Ad Clerum? If he was a teacher, banker etc you wouldn't be questioning his sense of vocation. The Rev Richard Coles is also a journalist and constantly on TV. I suspect that the way the CiW and CofE is going.....soon all clergy will be NSM.
DeleteI have an ex friend soon to be ordained. She is openly abusive to brexiters, Tories, anyone who believes marriage is only between a man and a woman. She campaigns in favour of puberty blockers for 7 year old children and a whole lot of trans issues. Foul mouthed. But deemed suitable to be ordained - England not Wales.
ReplyDeleteCymraes yn Lloegr
In which case, she'll probably be the next Archbishop of Canterbury.
Delete
ReplyDelete@ Danny Jones
I didn't intend to imply that NSM's ought not have primary sources of income; heavens above no - there are too many excellent examples of their values both as priests and in the wider experience they bring to their 'vocations'. It would be a somewhat boring Church without them. No, what I suggested was that it is quite right and proper for their seniors and those ultimately responsible for the 'cadre' of diocesan priests to decline them if there was any early sniff that the means by which they conduct their 'day jobs' might in any way cause risk to the 'establishment' of the CofE or CinW etc. as clearly (well clearly to me) the platform this particular ordinand has or is doing. In the same way, it would only be reasonable to enable a Bishop to put his/her foot down if a stipended-priest where to take on a second 'job' - in political life for instance or as branch manager of BetFred promoting on-line gaming - which would/could be in conflict with church members' affinities or indeed the teachings of the Church. I hope this corrects any misrepresentation of my opinions.
Ad Clerum
Obviously there are part-time and non-stipendiary Baptist ministers, too. But, if we want to take on another paid post - or even a voluntary one which is going to take up a significan chunk of our time - we have to clear it with our local church leaders.
ReplyDeleteAhhaaa Baptist Trainfan: You've reminded me of a fine example of how with temperance non-stipeniary clergy can also break the 'stay away from politics' rule as a second-job. OK, I recall he was Methodist not Baptist - either way Nonconformist! - but one of our finest 'safe pair of hands' politicians was the Rt. Hon. George Thomas who was also an occasional chapel preacher. Yeah: there are exceptions! (Has anyone checked on the health of 'TP' recently: he seems oddly quiet!)
ReplyDeleteAd Clerum
Methodist Local Preachers are Lay, not clergy. They train to preach but do so as volunteers in their own time.
DeleteThanks for the video-link AB. Certainly worth watching and insightful. Calvin might make a good guest-editor of Ancient Briton to have our mob of bishops squirm in their thrones
ReplyDeleteAd Clerum
Having watched the video twice, it seems to me that Mr Robinson sounds entirely sensible and is merely preaching the straight-forward traditional Anglo Catholic lines most of us were brought up with before the right-on politically correct deviants got onto the Bench.
DeleteAfter the rubbish we've had to put up with for the last eight years he would get my vote for the vacant Deanery in Llandaff!
On a different tack. Would anyone agree with my thinking? -June is to retire, soon. Llandaff deanery has been vacant for two years. Should it not be left to -June's successor to appoint the new Dean, given that her anointed one could be in place many years after her retirement and may not well fit the plans of said successor?
ReplyDeleteUnison Off
No.
DeleteLlandaff has effectively been without a Dean for ten years and definitely without one for over two years already.
Your suggestion would involve extending that by at least another year.
The few remaining pew sitters in Llandaff deserve better however, the chances of getting anyone to agree to coming to sort out the omnishambles must be just about zero in any case.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-61733995
ReplyDeleteWhen is a woman a woman and when is a woman not a woman?
"Wokeism" led by the left wing donkeys in Cardiff Bay.
Can they even agree on the definition of a woman?