Thursday, 24 November 2022

Congregational Catholics

Cardinal Reinhard Marx and fellow bishops from Germany meeting with Pope Francis at the Vatican, Nov. 17, 2022 | Vatican Media. Source: CNA

At the Collation & Installation of the new Dean of Llandaff, the Rev Canon Richard Peers, the retiring bishop, June Osbourne, repeated the claim that "the Church in Wales is part of the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church", a claim rejected by the Catholic and Orthodox Churches following the unilateral action of some Anglicans to ordain women to the priesthood.

 The bishop invited the Dean-designate to make the following declaration:

"I do solemnly declare my belief in the Faith which is revealed in Holy Scripture and set forth in 
the Catholic Creeds and to which the historic formularies, namely the Thirty-nine Articles of 
Religion, the Book of Common Prayer, and the Ordering of Bishops, Priests, and Deacons as
published in 1662, bear witness; and in public prayer and the administration of the Sacraments,
I will use only those forms of service which are allowed by lawful authority, and none other. And
I hereby undertake to be bound by the Constitution of the Church in Wales, and to accept,
submit to, and carry out any sentence or judgement which may at any time be passed upon me
by the Archbishop, a Diocesan Bishop or any Court or the Tribunal of the Church in Wales."

Somewhat removed from the faith of one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, the Dean of Llandaff is in a same sex relationship living openly with his partner. The campaigning bishop of Monmouth is also living openly with her partner in a same sex relationship while the Archbishop of Wales is a re-married divorcee.

How can this be? 

Anglican beliefs allow local discretion under The Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral :

1. The Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments as the revealed Word of God.
2. The Nicene Creed as the sufficient statement of the Christian Faith.
3. The two Sacraments,–Baptism and the Supper of the Lord,–ministered with unfailing use of Christ’s words of institution and of the elements ordained by Him.
4. The Historic Episcopate, locally adapted in the methods of its administration to the varying needs of the nations and peoples called of God into the unity of His Church.

'Locally adapted' opens a can of worms. The liberal agenda took hold in the Episcopal Church of the United States (ECUSA, now TEC). In 2003 Anglican provinces declare 'impaired' or 'broken' relationship with ECUSA following the consecration of Gene Robinson, the first openly gay priest to be consecrated a bishop in a major Christian denomination, as bishop of New Hampshire.

Within a generation liberal revisionists have taken control of many Anglican provinces. The Church in Wales has become a joke among orthodox Anglicans and the wider Christian fellowship. The Church of England teeters on the edge of disaster as bishops push their latest deception, Living in Love and Faith.

Liberal provinces face extinction while Anglicanism elsewhere thrives. In the USA, Alarm Bells as Episcopal Church Decline Accelerates but nothing deters the revisionists. If at first they don't succeed they try, try and try again until they have their own way.

For those Anglicans who swam the Tiber the same ominous signs are appearing as German bishops meet with Pope Francis amid concern over Synodal Way

The president of the German Bishops’ Conference, Bishop Georg Bätzing, said he will not deny blessings for same-sex couples.

The Synodal Way "is a controversial discussion process underway in Germany with the declared aim of addressing the Church’s clerical sexual abuse crisis by debating and passing resolutions on whether, or how, Catholicism needs to change (“develop”) its teaching – and the Catholic Church therefore change its approach – to questions of sexuality and the exercise of power, including doctrine and the sacraments."

The Church of England Synod voted to ordain women to the priesthood and to the episcopate. The Governing Body of the Church in Wales followed suit. The Church of England is seeking to emulate the Church in Wales, blessing same sex partnerships as a precursor to same sex marriage in Church. Disaster looms closer.

Faith by committee is not the faith of the one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. Ultimately it has led to Jesus being depicted as a "rosy-cheeked Christ with breasts, beard and make-up jumping in front of a rainbow".


As Tony Barber wrote in the Financial Times yesterday, "The American priest and author Andrew Greeley once said: “The opposite of Catholic is not Protestant. The opposite of Catholic is sectarian.” But just as secular politics in western countries is a battleground between mutually suspicious conservatives and liberals, so Greeley’s appeal to respect differences of religious opinion is drowning in a doctrinal struggle for control of the Roman Catholic Church."

Postscript [04.12.2022]

84 comments:

  1. My dear AB.

    First thread of your newly posted 'congregational catholics' read well and raised more questions about choice of senior clergy in an already out of control Church-in-Wales which, unable to retain its 'established' congregant-base and 'traditional' clergy thinks the way forward is to go-Catholic - or Gay. All much agreed by the majority of us.

    But why muddy the waters by introducing the 'Novus Ordo' Roman Catholic Bishop of Limburg, Germany (Georg Batzing) and his most peculiar theologies and writings. He is already widely ridiculed in Germany (read the esteemed Bunte magazine article March 2022) and left to the Vatican, if he were also head of the Banco Ambrossiano Vatican Bank, he'd be hanging under Blackfrier's Bridge, London. He is denounced left, right and centre.

    Bunte magazine - favoured reading of all Germans, Catholic and Lutheran - wrote: "No catholic bone in his body in the Land of Luther makes Batzing fit for the job".

    Introducing this nunce into AncientBriton discussion is akin to suggesting that the Rev'd Dr. Iain Paisley's 'Pontificals' on Peace and Reconcilliation with Rome would be taken seriously.

    AncientBritain is respected by its readers/bloggers because it has for years been rational. Can't understand why you therefore dug deeply into Google to find a nutter of a Bishop in Germany to try and strengthen an already on-side consensus to the overall theme.

    His opinions on the subject are irrelevant and indeed, to Germans he too is irrelevant.

    To bloggers tempted to reply: read up on Germany's reaction of Bishop Batzing first! He's totally shunned and his voice ridiculed. Ditto on this website I hope.

    Aufrichtig frund
    Ad Clerum

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why would anyone be foolish enough to believe a single word from the mouth of Caiaphas or any such declaration from Dick the Dean?
    They're both apostate hypocrites.
    The entire Cult in Wales is dead in the water, holed below the waterline and half submerged already in its own squalor and filth. The sooner it sinks the better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thankfully it seems that the Cathedral Green will be seeing the back of Caiaphas imminently.

      Delete
  3. Agreed entirely 1662. But once she's gone let's not have years and years of AB blogger whingeing and retrospective call-outs of her name as with Barry Morgan is all to blame etc. etc. etc. Let's all focus on who might next be the Wrecker of Llandaff or, if there's a good choice, respect him/her. God forbid that the decision-takers opt for the buffoon ++Andrew John to translate from Bangor .. much as we here in North Wales would love to see the back of him.

    Old Bill (from Ad Clerum's laptop).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The next Wreaker of Llandaff will probably be Jeffrey John, then the dioceses of Llandaff and Monmouth can hold hands

      Delete
    2. I heard JJ had retired years ago but in any case is roughly the same age as Caiaphas, i.e., already past or approaching 70.
      Do keep up QP.

      Delete
    3. Old Bill

      'respect him/her'?

      The presupposition there is: sex is irrelevant for the priesthood.

      If sex is irrelevant, then so must be sexual orientation (heterosexuality and homosexuality).

      If that be the case, then to be transgendered must be irrelevant too.

      Delete
  4. JJ will not be eligible when the Electoral College convenes. Almost sure it's going to be A translation from Bangor .
    Unison Off.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Sir

    'The Church of England Synod voted to ordain women to the priesthood and to the episcopate. The Governing Body of the Church in Wales followed suit.'

    The institutional presupposition here: the Kingdom of God must be a democracy; not a monarchy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The Catholic wing of The Church In Wales voted FOR the ordination of women because they were assured of alternative Episcopal Oversight. Promises broken after the first PAB retired. Shameful.
    Unison Off

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Too many well-meaning people swallowed the lies in good faith and were then shafted by duplicitous Barry Morgan.
      The rest, as they say, is history...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous at 14:41

      So the 'orthodox' voted to severely damage the all male-priesthood, stretching back to King Melchizedek, in return for a promise presented by heretics.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous at 14:41

      So the 'orthodox' voted to severely damage the all male-priesthood, stretching back to King Melchizedek, in return for a promise presented by heretics.

      Delete
  7. The church has been seriously flawed and finances depleted by its obsession with LGBT issues. The strident 'out' gay brigade has found a home in the Church. It has used the Christian imperative to love and care to find favour there for anything it says or demands. It knows full well that the Church cannot effectively oppose them.

    In effect, LGBT candidates have made a utility of the Church for their own ends.

    We need only look at Monmouth, Llandaff and St Davids, and at the paucity of leadership at the top in the form of the ABWales to see LGBT achievements.

    One could ask what more they want as the flag-waving continues unabated.

    LW

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They always had a home in the Church in Wales but it wasn't enough for them, the gay cabal wanted a hostile takeover.

      Delete
    2. What is this gay cabal you speak of - I don't recogbnise it. A gay dean and a gay bishop in a province does not consitute a cabal. And much more healthy than those gay clergy - evangelical and liberal - who lead a double life - still a few of those about!!!

      UtterNonsense



      Delete
    3. Oooh, a Johhny come lately.
      Or is it another UntRuthy, TP or DD?
      The gay cabal is well documented in Llandaff for at least the last fifteen years.
      Start with the slimy amphibian Mr Toad and his boyfriend Dick the Server.
      Then there's the provious dud in the Deanery, the Capon.
      Now there's Dick the Dean, his boyfriend the gardener and Teilo the pooch.
      And don't forget the fag hags.

      Delete
    4. The gay cabal have been in Llandaff for some fifteen years or more.
      Don't forget the Roath Park duck feeders.
      Not forgetting the joint Head Vergers.

      Delete
    5. Roath Park duck feeders?

      UnAnon

      Delete
  8. Loathed as I am to prolong or extend the AB Blog LGBTQ-XYZ debate month after month (I think 99.9% of us are in agreement on this one and comments are now so, so, repetitive) but do look beyond Llandaff. Focus also on the archbishop's 'seat' of Bangor where at almost every twist and turn ++Andrew will appoint 'gays' to parishes from his day one, appointing the Lavatory Lingerer of Lampeter to archdeacon right through to present. This to include salaried lay such as the live-together cathedral director of music and his/her something-or-other. Of the 40+ clergy who have quit the Diocese of Bangor since the kilt-favouring 'Andy' was enthroned I have a feeling that without exception, all were 'straight' hetrosexuals. The Gays filled their seats. So to 'UtterNonsense' and others who ask 'Cabal - what Cabal? check it out.

    Doesn't bother me. I no longer worship within the C-in-W; I quite five or six years ago when I saw the writing on the lavatory wall.

    Old Bill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You were in the lavatory 🚽 reading the wall?

      Delete
    2. Old Bill

      'Loathed as I am to prolong or extend the AB Blog LGBTQ-XYZ debate month after month'.

      Yet the spiritual and theological problems remain and demand solutions.

      You may recall our school teachers instructing that if we got a sum wrong, then we were to retrace each step and make the correction.

      That is the royal road to progress.

      Delete
    3. "Of the 40+ clergy who have quit the Diocese of Bangor ..." ; the former Director of Ordinands and his civil partner, a ministry area leader, both recently having left the RCs, arrived in Bangor from Cardiff 3 or 4 years ago and have now departed. So not all 40+ were straight.

      Delete
  9. Yep 'Dick' aka Wilfred, some of the finest wit, poetic and literary genius is to be found in graffiti once you avert from the smut. One I still chuckle at I found in immaculate hand and measured line was in the Senior NCO's Mess of a particular army Regiment famed for its high discipline and intolerance to the least significant disorder. Some NCO must have spent hours in its printing and ruler-lining. It simply read:

    0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.
    10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0.
    Testing Pen
    Test completed
    Pen OK.

    But as with C-in-W churches, I don't frequent or drink in Gay Bars either so haven't spent too much time in their lavatories. But you 'dickie' ...?

    Old Bill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You were the one who admitted to reading lavatory walls. Quite an admission but there's no accounting for taste, or rather the lack of it.

      Delete
  10. Is there an Archdeacon in you Rod, at one of his Visitations last week, in a wonderfully restored church -' you should be getting rid of places like this and worshipping in car parks'. A lot of angry clerics. Another English import who counts for nothing.
    Unison Off

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In which case, do away with Llandaff Cathedral and let Rod use the High Street car park opposite the Spar.

      Delete
    2. He won't be needing anything near that large.
      For the few remaining pew sitters, the patch of tarmac just outside Clock house will be more than adequate...

      Delete
  11. Has the Welsh Bunch imposed something else on us through the back door? I never read Croeso as a rule, but was interested to read what minus June would have to say on her final days as The Ordinary of Llandaff. She rounds everything off with a quote of St Paul that ends with the word, Alleluia. Then says (though we are not allowed to say that in Advent) !!! Goodbye.
    Unison Off

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Caiaphas must go!6 December 2022 at 09:18

      Alleluia indeed.
      The useless fag hag has gone and won't be missed in the least.

      Delete
  12. https://anglican.ink/2022/11/23/retired-bishop-given-life-suspension-from-ministry-after-admitting-sexual-misconduct/

    Former bishop admits two counts of sexual abuse.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Unfortunately, he is not a FORMER bishop. His orders have not been nullified. He remains a bishop.
    Unison Off

    ReplyDelete
  14. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63792408

    Less than half of the population in England now relates as Christian.

    Justin Welby and the LGBTQIA cadre in the Church of England are succeeding in their objectives.

    ReplyDelete
  15. In Wales, the proportion of people reporting they have no religion rose from 32.1% in 2011 to 46.5% in 2021.

    I have no doubt that this is due in no small part to the tactics of bully boy Barry Morgan, the insipid John 'Shirley' Davies and the chocolate teapot Randy Pandy, assisted by the other pathetic specimens on the plank in Wales.
    What an utter disaster they are but they will all cash in on their non-contributory pensions.
    Performance related pay should be introduced!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm afraid I can't agree with that. The vast majority of the population have never even heard of the folk whose names keep popping up on this site and simply have no interest in religion. Your comment also, to me, seems to forget that the CinW is by no means the entire extent of "The Church" in Wales which includes many more denominations and also independent groups. I do think (and I've said it before) that the widely-reported sexual and financial scandals which have rocked the churches in recent years have undermined trust in Christianity as a whole; I also think that the endless concentration by many churches on matters of theology and praxis have severely impacted on their time and energy to look outwards instead of inwards.

      Although they make sad reading, I actually welcome the census figures. To me they show that people are thinking about how they fill in the forms and not making the blithe assumption that "I'm British, therefore I'm a Christian". Indeed it's been said that these are the hardest people to evangelise because any attempt to engage them in conversation evokes a response such as, "Oh, I don't really believe in all that God rubbish, and I never go to church - but I try to obey the Golden Rule and so I'm a Christian". I suspect that the proportion of "active" Muslims or Hindus (etc) among those who have so described themselves is far higher than the proportion of "active" Christians - although even in those communities there can be a genuine confusion between "ethnic" and "religious" identity.

      Delete
    2. Tell us more about the Baptist minister who was caught having sex with his Henry the Hoover whilst naked cleaning his Chapel. 😂 😂

      Delete
    3. Although no denomination, sadly, is free from scandal, I doubt that your story is true as Henrys aren't made by Hoover.

      Delete
    4. The vast majority of the population doesn't read this blog?
      So how did AB reach over 4 million views in just over a decade?
      Believe you me, more people read this blog than listen to the crap preaching from Welsh pulpits.,which is precisely why Barry Morgan was so desperate to get it closed down, just like the Llandaffchester Chronicles.

      Delete
    5. I assume you mean CiW pulpits? I preach from a non-CiW Welsh pulpit and would hope that if my preaching is crap, somebody would gently let me know! So far, apart from the odd person snoozing, most complaints have been minor!

      Delete
    6. @Baptist Trainfan.
      Reported in July this year.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/vicar-henry-hoover-sex-church-b2123488.html

      He was wearing only stockings at the time, but not a frock coat.
      🤣

      Delete
  16. Another possibility is the infantile and derogatory nature of the thoroughly unChristian contributors to this site. The rest of us, however few in number, do at least try faithfully to address the injunction to love one another and leave the judging to God.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      Yeah, right.
      Of course that must be it.

      The injunction to love one another was not an exhortation to promote or engage in sodomy, lesbianism or homosexuality in general, either among the clergy or the laity.
      As for leaving the judging to God, your allegations concerning "infantile", "derogatory" and "thoroughly unChristian" AB contributors reveal the exact opposite as well as your hypocrisy.
      If you really are one of the few remaining gullible lemmings in the pews, then you have failed to discern that you are being led to damnation by the false prophets who have infested the Cult in Wales and Church of England.

      Delete
    2. AnnO

      Would you be kind enough and stoop, to teach us what 'love' is?

      Delete
    3. Completely wrong Anno. The Church has lost dignity, authority, splendour, greatness, influence, otherness, by following and encouraging secular trends, thereby making itself irrelevant and meaningless to the general population who can't see what it's for. You are correct about the injunction to love one another of course, and that applies to people who don't agree with you and those it suits you to label 'unchristian'. You must be glad you're not like other people.
      LW

      Delete
    4. Anne Orifice.
      Speaking with the usual lack of Scriptural authority.
      Make it up as you go along DD/UntRuthy/TP/the usual gay cabal suspects.

      Delete
    5. @LW
      The Church lost all of that as soon as it abandoned the Apostolic succession and voted for the likes of the Archdeaconesse Peggy "the taxman will never know" Pilate, Jenny Wigley, DodoJo, Caiaphas and Offa's trench to be ordained.
      The decline accelerated exponentially from that date.

      Delete
  17. Any 'Forensic Linguist' (yes, there is such being often used by Police and even University degrees bestowed in the science) would swear blue that the text, verbage, punctuation points, etc. have appeared on this site before in umpteen other guises. Perhaps they are a 'cabal'. The contradiction in describing the majority of AB bloggers as 'infantile' then going on to ooze 'love' is a give-away.

    Old Bill

    ReplyDelete
  18. Oh so sorry! Forgive me, but I had not come across the exclusions to the injunctions love one another! Must research this, and would of course welcome the Scriptural references.
    However I stand corrected in respect of my own condemnatory language, withdrawing all but ‘Unchristian’ pro tem, eschewing similarly of course any form of name-calling as a means of making a point.
    Love is actually all you need, chums, at least in my experience as a (very long) andl active member of the Church in Wales

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gay "love"?

      Delete
    2. AnnO

      'Love is actually all you need'.

      Then the God you are worshipping is unknown to Christianity.

      This how you have done it.

      You have reversed St John's 'God is love' to 'Love is God.'

      Heresy.

      Delete
    3. Love is all you need?
      The gospel of John Lennon, not Yeshua the son of God.
      Such cretinous comments are more usually made by the current crop of Archdemons.

      Delete
    4. You're too busy making up non-existent inclusions to notice the exclusions.

      Delete
  19. Anno. You cannot claim that the Church's promotion of homosexuality is valid under your definition of 'love' no matter what your own tendencies are. But perhaps you do,
    LW

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What an extraordinary level of debate!
      Ave atque vale, fellas.

      Delete
    2. There is no need of any debate.
      You're wrong and that's all there is to it.
      Begone and take your heresy elsewhere.

      Delete
  20. AnnO

    How appropriate from you - a line from the Roman homosexual poet: Catullus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You clearly have not read the Lesbia poems. She would have been surprised to hear Catullus described as homosexual, as would Furius and Aurelius

      Delete
  21. To the hetrosexual men among us: Per Ad U Som Crump?
    Old Bill (Latin 'O' Level - failed)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh look, another one.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-63812407
      Drunk.
      Rape.
      Plod.

      Delete
  22. Love is all you need. Perfect love casts out fear - even of the homophobic kind. Be nice perps. Be nice.

    DD Ruthy TP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rubbish.
      Man does not live by bread alone.

      Delete
    2. DD Ruthy TP.

      'Love is all you need.'

      Could you advise, if you see paedophilia as a sexual orientation?

      Delete
    3. No I don’t. Love is consensual.

      DD

      Delete
    4. Silly question - it’s abuse. Non consensual and largely heterosexual abuse of power.

      DD

      Delete
    5. DD at 19:56

      'Love is consensual.

      DD'

      You accept paedophilia - so long as it is consensual.

      Like Peter Thatchell?

      Delete
    6. D. Singh - I couldn't have been more clear 'it's abuse' is what I said, but you can't cope with losing an argument on the internet so make sh*t up about what I intended by what I said. You're a complete fool.

      DD

      Delete
    7. You could certainly have been clearer. You described it as abuse, but you then went on to give what appears to be the reason why you think it abuse, viz. that it’s a non-consensual abuse of power. So D. Singh was justified in asking his or her question. Is it part of your definition of paedophilia that it is necessarily non-consensual? If yes, is that (a) because you do not regard an act to which a child consents as paedophilia or (b) because you do not consider children (any children?) as capable of giving consent? If no, do you regard acts of paedophilia as acceptable if the child consents?
      RB

      Delete
    8. It's abuse.

      DD

      Delete
  23. DD at 14:06

    Do you accept that paedophilia is abuse, even when it is consensual?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, it's abuse, you obviously don't have the first idea about consent.

      DD

      Delete
  24. Can I clarify, paedophilia was something others mentioned as a trope to dimiss my comment 'love is all you need' - it couldn't have been further from my mind. Grotesque perversion of what I intended - not at all surprised, of course, it's what fuels this awful site.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
  25. DD at 18:38

    When you stated 'love is all you need'; it had the attraction of a moral absolute and invited curiosity as to whether or not it was qualified.

    Now that you have qualified it we can see that 'love', by itself, is insufficient (as it imports abuse).

    I wonder in which other ways we can whittle down your 'love is all you need'.

    You've made a good start by your concession.

    ReplyDelete
  26. You didn't ask me what my definition of love is - I've always agreed with the definition Fletcher gives, namely, that love can be equated with justice for "love and justice are the same, for justice is love distributed, nothing else". With what do you equate love? I would assume you to have some difficulty with Fletcher's relativism.

    Whittle me down if you so wish - and since it is important to you, then you win and I am happy to concede to your greater intelligence.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. DD at 20:29

      'I've always agreed with the definition Fletcher gives, namely, that love can be equated with justice for "love and justice are the same, for justice is love distributed, nothing else'.

      When two homosexuals buy a baby: is that 'justice is love distributed'?

      Slavery: the buying and selling of a human without his or her consent.



      Delete
  27. I see what you’re doing. You’re keeping your question about beastiality as your trump card aren’t you? What do I think about bestiality? Yes I know that’s where you’re headed. But I’ll save you from asking the question and declare you are the winner. Congratulations you win on the Internet have a wonderful day.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
  28. Classic gaslighting Singh - we see you.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
  29. DD at 07:37

    Perhaps you could assist me on related matters.

    If homosexual 'marriage' is the moral equivalent of opposite sex marriage, then:

    1. How is a homosexual 'marriage' consumated?

    2. How does one party to a homosexual 'marriage' commit adultery?

    ReplyDelete
  30. Love and fidelity are what consummate a marriage. It’s quite medieval to reduce consummation to physical intercourse to the neglect of mutual love and the intimate sharing of lives.

    Adultery is allowing another relationship to detract from the person you have committed to share your life with. Again, it’s too simple to reduce that to sex - some of the most adulterous relationships could well be non sexual if we are not careful.

    DD

    ReplyDelete
  31. DD at 10:15

    'Love and fidelity are what consumate a marriage.'

    1. English and Welsh law does not recognise the consumation of a homosexual 'marriage.'

    Bang goes moral equivalence!

    2. The legal definition of adultery was clarified by the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, to confirm that adultery can only be committed between people of the opposite sex.

    Therefore, a party to a homosexual 'marriage' would need to commit adultery with someone of the opposite sex.

    Bang goes the bald assertion 'We were born homosexual'!

    Bang goes moral equivalence.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Furthermore, even if the national churches permit homosexual 'marriage', the parties to such marriages will never achieve equality.

      Homosexual 'marriages' are sterile.

      They can only acquire babies through contractual means: the selling and buying of babies: slavery.

      Here a little, there a little: sin committed in defence of sin.

      Violence will be the eventual result; for there is no other way, ultimately, to defend the lie.

      Delete
    2. Yet again, you win on the internet. We’ll done 10/10.

      DD

      Delete
    3. DD at 14:11

      It is written:

      For there is no truth in their mouth; their inmost self is destruction; their throat is an open grave; they flatter with their tongue.

      Psalm 5:9

      Delete