Friday 27 January 2023

Equal marriage!


Secure: Ben Bradshaw and his civil partner Neal Dalgleish.
Mr Bradshaw has drawn the ire of gay rights campaigners by
 opposing gay marriage  Source: Mail Online


When Ben Bradshaw was the first MP to enter into a civil partnership he argued that 'Britain doesn't need gay marriage'.

The son of an Anglican priest, he is now following the Gadarene bishops of the Church of England and the fallen bishops of the Church in Wales pushing for so called 'equal' marriage. 

Marriage is between a man and a woman, to the exclusion of all others and for life. Supporters of 'equal' marriage are using secular equalities legislation to suggest that those who believe in orthodox teaching on marriage do not believe in equality and discriminate against them. This was Bradshaw's approach.

From Hansard Volume 726: debated on Tuesday 24 January 2023-
"(Urgent Question): To ask the Second Church Estates Commissioner if he will make a statement on the outcome of the meeting of Church of England bishops on equal marriage in the Church of England."

Mr Bradshaw asked the Second Church Estates Commissioner if he "Will he explain to Parliament how continuing to discriminate against lesbian and gay Anglicans in England is compatible with the unique duty of the established Church to serve everyone?

Presumably the MP for Exeter is unaware or simply ignores the plight of the many Anglicans who are no longer served by the established Church because they believe in the orthodox teaching of the majority of Anglicans throughout the world.

The same could be said of the member for Rhondda, ex-Anglican priest, Sir Chris Bryant who claimed in an emotional speech that 'There is an awful lot of pain'. 

Indeed there is, particularly in Wales where orthodox believers have been abandoned by their Church.

Sir Chris spoke of a Churchwarden who had lovingly cared for the church and had fallen in love with someone of the same sex but could not be married in the place to which the warden's life had been devoted.

Perhaps the member for Rhondda could spare a similar thought for all those orthodox Anglicans, many of whom have been benefactors and hard workers who maintained their churches only to find themselves excluded by secularists who are using the Church to satisfy their own desires.  

This is the trajectory of the Church of England under the 'guidance' of its most senior bishops as seen by Anglican Ink:

The Archbishop of Canterbury was assailed outside Lambeth Palace last night by gay activists who denounced his leadership of the Church of England’s Living in Love and Faith process. He complained of getting “flak” from opponents of the Church of England’s decision to allow the blessing of same-sex partnerships while Global South archbishops warn that the adoption of gay blessings would lead to the removal of Welby as leader of the Anglican world. 

Gay sex not a sin, Archbishop of York says, if blessed by the CofE.

Homosexuals must no longer be chaste in order to lead godly lives, Bishop of London says.

'Equality' is replacing theology. God help us all.

Postscript [28.01.2023]

 #comeoutforlove... as the Actress said to the Bishop.

 In this instance the actress is a political activist, atheist and humanist who came out as a lesbian in 1994. Just the person to have the archbishop's ear. 

46 comments:

  1. Gay marriage asks of God that he bless something which he did not design.
    Only a casual and unbelieving 'faith' can condone the idea of Christian marriage between two people of the same sex.
    LW

    ReplyDelete
  2. I stared in incredulity at the picture of Jayne Ozanne outside Lambeth Palace with her placard "Discrimination is not a Christian value". It is OK for her and her friends to bully the archbishop of Canterbury in an attempt to get him to think her way. That's OK, because bullying is obviously a Christian value in her eyes. Isn't that the way in which all these minority groups work?
    Seymour

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bradshaw is full of bull crap.
    The unique duty of the established Church is to serve God, not to serve "everyone".
    Its duty to "everyone" is to instruct them in the faith, teach them what sin is and how best to avoid it, in accordance with God's teaching and will, not the teaching and will of Jayne Ozanne, Peter Tatchell or Nicola Sturgeon!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said indeed FM.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64426465
      Please also add this prat to your list.

      Delete
  4. Is this a case of St. David's juxtoposition: 'Never, ever, trust a Labour member...'?

    Old Bill

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Christian Faith, in my humble opinion, was created after Jesus destroyed death by His Resurrection and His teachings whilst among us. Originally in this land, now the United Kingdom, the Faith was the Roman Church or Roman Catholic. When Henry VIII couldn’t get his way with Rome he broke away and started the Anglican Church. Over the Centuries others have disagreed and broken away setting their own Faith.
    Apologies for boring you all with the above and my poor way of explaining my understanding of past history. My point is quite simple. If there are many of a sexual persuasion that isn’t strict heterosexual, i.e. one man and one woman both having been born that gender, who cannot accept the Church as it stood and stands, I would invite to break away and form their own form of Christianity as others had the courage to do so in the past. This would include all Ordained persons who are “gay”.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To answer my own comment. If the Gay community did form their own avenue of Faith they could firstly remove from the Bible all passages they deem offensive. However, having formed their own Avenue they would have to give up their Parsonage and their Stipend. None would have the courage to do that.

      Delete
  6. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-64430491
    Murders outside a Jerusalem synagogue on Holocaust Memorial day.
    A new low even by the appalling standards of the sick "religion of peace".

    ReplyDelete
  7. With apologies to Ancient Briton for being slightly off topic, but according to the Wokerati at AP, the word "the" is now deemed to be divisive and offensive.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-64436973
    Whatever!
    The plankers on the bench are still the plonkers they ever were.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rather like the plankers in England and Wales and senior staff in the BBC, one can only conclude that the overpaid and underworked idiots at Associated Press clearly have far too much spare time on their hands.

      Delete
  8. Admin Note: Anonymous commentators must use a pseudonym if their comment is for publication.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't get why so many people are upset about same-sex marriage in churches. You can be in the congregation with people and not he anything anything to do with them and you don't have to go to their weddings or blessings. So if you're sensible they will have very little impact on you. As regards that of destiny up to them. As St Paul indicates says we are all responsible for our own salvation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is all very well for congregants, but what about clergy who are opposed to such a move in conscience? They have to allow their churches to be used even if they do not agree with what is happening in their church.
      I know that stealing is wrong. Would it make it morally right if I got you to steal for me? This is what the plankers have done to the clergy, here in Wales. The clergy can object to performing the 'rites' associated with Same Sex Marriage. I will not call it a blessing because God does not bless that which he has deemed to be sinful. However, the clergy must find someone else to perform in their stead.
      For many congregations this is akin to desecrating a place of worship.
      Seymour

      Delete
    2. I seriously doubt you're even a Churchgoer Ted.
      In Wales there are now almost less than ten thousand and they are an endangered species.

      Delete
    3. Ted, I can go to my local church and unless a couple of the same sex make it blindingly obvious I will not know if they are an item. If they do make it obvious to me I will treat them per my belief in the Bible. If they then make it known they wish to have their relationship formalised in church I will certainly object

      Delete
  10. You'd think the rabid feminists would be happy.
    Marriage is equal between one man and one woman.
    What more could they possibly want?

    ReplyDelete
  11. An interesting case to watch out for is happening in Leicester Diocese where the Chancellor of the Diocese has to rule on whether a pride flag altar frontal is permissible. The ruling is due within days.
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/pride-flag-on-altar-of-church-of-woke-triggers-almighty-court-battle/ar-AA16Qkg6?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=2944d991e6e44a488ccfc2ddab1fd8ec
    Seymour

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You'd think the answer to that question was glaringly bloody obvious.
      The church building is supposed to be a house of God, God does not bless sin, pride is one of the seven deadly sins and so a piece of cloth symbolising one of the seven deadly sins should be burned, not draped over the holy table to insult the sanctity of the place!

      Delete
    2. The Chancellor of the Diocese needs to be involved? And at what cost?
      Hopefully those responsible will be held liable and ordered to repay the Diocese as well as instructed to remove that obscenity from the building.

      Delete
    3. More woke drivel but what else does anyone expect from the Church of England under Welby?
      A priestess and a transgender church warden more interested in campaigning for gay and trans "rights" than God or Christianity. Their agenda is plastered all over the notice board outside the church before you even get into the building.

      Delete
  12. Faith Militant, agree with you. The Anglican Church throughout the U.K. should follow the Bible as laid down by the KJV. No question or if in disagreement leave the Church. However both the Church of England would not agree to leave the Established Church of England. Similarly the Church in Wales, the Church in Wales, secularly is and has been,since Diseatablishment, been run byThe Representative Body of the Church in Wales. Heirarchy both
    .Spiritual and Secular may wish to change this and include “Pride”, the usage of the word Pride” is against everything The Bible stands for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Subversive Canon30 January 2023 at 21:34

      The "Representative" Body as a whole represents nobody, except perhaps themselves.
      Occasionally there might be one or two good apples in the barrel but if so, they soon give up and leave.
      Darth --Insidious, Barry "the spider at the centre of the web 🕸" Morgan took care of that twenty years ago, may he burn in hell.

      Delete
    2. Subversive Canon, as you undoubtedly know, the Representative Body receives various Reports of the Committees reporting to it. If the Reports are voted as accepted they are forwarded to the Governing Body meeting where all can be Challenged or adopted. On this Site, we are all keyboard warriors, we support the Belief we adore and totally believe in. There are others who wish to follow the Christian Faith although they cannot accept to do so is against their sexual practices.

      Delete
  13. Don't all the various Constabularies just fill you full of confidence?
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-64451185
    Firearms licensing officer only received "on the job" training.
    Little wonder things keep going badly wrong, time and time and time again!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yet more Wokeism courtesy of Haringey Council.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-64456137
    Sounds as though a number of the locals have decided to fight back and good for them.

    Bewildered

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Isn't that Dianne Abbott's stomping ground?
      If so, little wonder.
      It's not as if there are more important problems to be dealt with than historic street names, is it?

      Delete
  15. Baptist Trainfan1 February 2023 at 08:38

    It's not Diane Abbott's constituency - that's Hackney & Stoke Newington and is further east.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the information, I wasn't sure. Who is the sitting MP there then?

      Delete
    2. Baptist Trainfan2 February 2023 at 14:09

      Catherine West (Labour). I used to live in the area but not since the mid-1990s.

      Delete
  16. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64488473
    Left wing fascist apologises.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Welby would rather see the Church of England disestablished than the Anglican Communion split up over the issue of gay marriage.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/feb/01/better-c-of-e-is-disestablished-than-risk-split-justin-welby-reportedly-says
    MPs leak details of conversation during a meeting but Welby's gophers in Lambeth issue a denial of what is claimed to have been said.

    ReplyDelete
  18. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-64493289
    Woke revisionist black history syllabus altered in the US.
    George and Kevin will have lots more to discuss in the next edition of Anglican Unscripted.
    Bewildered

    ReplyDelete
  19. Those who celebrate 'pride' won't like this.
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/christian-mum-sues-four-year-old-son-s-school-claiming-he-had-to-take-part-in-lgbt-parade/ar-AA1700E3?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=cbde0a06580f4e239c20a234ae890aca
    Seymour

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for the parents and not before time.
      The alphabet deviants have infested the schools as well as the Churches.

      Delete
    2. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/02/02/sturgeon-gender-policy-disarray-refuses-say-transgender-rapist/
      Story of the week.
      Nicola Sturgeon has the same difficulty defining a woman as Church of England bishops.
      The sheer stupidity over this issue beggars belief.

      Delete
    3. Maybe not women's athletics yet though.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/athletics/64514819

      Delete
  20. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-64512195
    The Church of England bishops and Nicola Sturgeon are not alone in being unable to define a woman. 😂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-64495574
      "She" is the father and "he" is the mother.
      God help the poor child who is to be born into this mess.

      Delete
    2. Where Nicola Sturgeon tries to lead, dopey Dripford is sure to try and follow.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-64548844
      Here's hoping Westminster also blocks this rubbish.

      Delete
  21. https://anglican.ink/2023/02/01/bishop-of-coventry-reports-member-of-general-synod-to-the-police-for-the-hate-crime-of-promoting-biblical-sexual-teachings/
    The Bishop of Coventry takes his?30 pieces of silver from the LGBTQIA*+-&£#@ cabal and betrays Sam Margrave to the thought Plod.
    Also discussed on Anglican unscripted 786.

    ReplyDelete
  22. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-64527709
    Virtue signalling reaches new heights.
    If the family want to make reparations they could refund the British tax payers the massive sums they were paid for their slaves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So said George Conger and I quite agree.

      Delete
  23. Faith militent, women’s athletics please expand

    ReplyDelete
  24. @ Enoch 02-02-23

    I actually agree with Justin Welby. If its to be one over the other, then better by far to cut the ties with the Dept. of Culture, Media and Sport etc. and 'disestablish'. But just remember how disestablishment impacted on the Church-in-Wales ... headlong plummet into the cesspit of LGBTQ+ degradation, bickering and 'half-cock' teaching.

    Old Bill

    ReplyDelete
  25. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64561692
    Lesbian Saint Sandi sticking her oar in again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why does a Humanist (read atheist) give a damn about what a Church does or doesn't believe or do?
      She should be told to go forth and multiply.

      Delete